What underlies the Administration’s effort to examine human rights through the State Department’s newly created Commission on Unalienable Rights? And what is at stake? The asserted purpose of the Commission, as announced in July 2019 by Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, is to examine human rights in light of “foundational documents” and provide advice to the Secretary on the development of human rights principles to guide U.S. foreign policy. Advocates have raised concern that the Commission, which includes a chair and members with well-known and extreme positions opposing reproductive rights and LGBTQI rights, is subterfuge for rolling back rights protections for women, LGBTQI people, and other marginalized and vulnerable communities. These concerns are well-founded, including and particularly with respect to reproductive rights. This essay (1) highlights and counters the Administration’s assertion of confusion over the status of reproductive rights as human rights, (2) examines the Administration’s attempts to purge reproductive rights from the global discourse, and (3) explores its attacks on reproductive rights within the United States to probe an underlying interest in undermining rights, including reproductive rights, through the creation of the Commission.
Download the PDFMore HRLR Online
Disabling Travel: Quantifying the Harm of Inaccessible Hotels to Disabled People
Disabling Travel: Quantifying the Harm of Inaccessible Hotels to Disabled People Kristen L. Popham, Elizabeth F. Emens & Jasmine E. Harris Table of Contents Introduction 3 I. Firsthand Accounts of Disabled Individuals Burdened by Violations of the Reservation Rule 13 A. Experiences of Travelers Unable to Acquire Accessibility Information About the Hotel Because the Hotel…
Constitutional Incentive to Care: Immigrant Children’s Mental Health
Constitutional Incentive to Care: Immigrant Children’s Mental Health Erin Kurvers Table of Contents Introduction 1118 I. Migration Patterns, Legal Protections, and Mental Health Needs 1121 A. Trends in Migration of Unaccompanied Migrant Minors to the United States 1122 B. Federal Requirements for the Treatment of Unaccompanied Migrant Minors 1125 1. Flores Settlement Agreement 1126 2….
Vague Made Vogue: The Unconstitutionality of the Particularly Serious Crime Bar
Vague Made Vogue: The Unconstitutionality of the Particularly Serious Crime Bar Haylee R. Bunner Table of Contents Introduction 1002 I. The Evolution of the Particularly Serious Crime Bar and the Void for Vagueness Doctrine 1006 A. The Current State of the Particularly Serious Crime Bar 1006 1. Evolution of the Particularly Serious Crime Bar 1008…