Pereira v. Sessions: A Jurisdictional Surprise for Immigration Courts

Download the PDF

Kit Johnson is an Associate Professor at the University of Oklahoma College of Law.

The U.S. Supreme Court issued a bombshell opinion regarding immigration court procedure on June 21, 2018: Pereira v. Sessions. On its face, the case is a boon for certain noncitizens seeking relief from deportation. Yet, as this Essay explains, Pereira’s implications are far greater. Although the Court’s opinion never mentions jurisdiction, Pereira necessarily means that immigration courts lack jurisdiction over virtually every case filed in the last three years, plus an unknown number of earlier-filed cases. This situation arises from the chronic failure of the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to comply with the law in commencing deportation proceedings. With the clarity afforded by Pereira, the result is that these pending removal cases should be dismissed.

Download the PDF

More H.R.L.R.

Standing for Workers’ Rights: Expanding Access to Federal Courts for Workers Bringing Wage Theft Suits Against Employers Post-TransUnion

Rongzhen Zhou

EMTALA’s Latent Cause of Action: Hospitals’ Duty to Keep Emergency Care “Available”

Lauren E. Pelosi

International Criminal Court (ICC) and the Pursuit of Global Justice: “A Court Worth Having”—Predicaments to the Court’s Enforcement and Frameworks for Improving Compliance

Emma Askarisirchi
See all